An electronic system for purchasing high-quality services

original text is here

MARKETPLACE FOR SALES OF HIGH-QUALITY SERVICES

*    *    *

Electronic System of Honest Rating v2.0 - Simplified Version

Checking the quality of a product isn't difficult. Simply submit it for inspection. Each product has certain minimum specifications it must meet. If it doesn't meet these requirements, it must be returned to the seller, and certain penalties are also applied.

я    

But in the service sector, things are much more complicated. You can't simply "submit a service for inspection" because a service isn't a physically transportable object. Services are also much more difficult to standardize than simple goods.

Add to this the fact that, thanks to the spread of the internet (video conferencing) and electronic money, some services (consultations, lessons, lectures) can now be provided remotely. And when the seller and buyer are located in different parts of the world, this greatly complicates the process of recovering damages through the courts (the courts themselves become quite expensive).

This has given rise to a group known as "infogypsies." Those elusive sellers of air.

But there is a way to combat them. You just need to organize your reviews more carefully, because the quality of a service provider can only be assessed through them.

We need to create an electronic "honest review" system, the main purpose of which will be to generate the most honest reviews possible for service providers. This system should operate as automatically as possible (with minimal involvement of third parties). We want the system to be simple and convenient for both the service provider and the buyer.

We want it to be well-suited for all popular services, such as plumber, hairdresser, auto repairman, computer technician, appliance repair, home renovation, handyman, sewing services, photographer, lawyer, doctor, sports coach, teacher, tutor, consultant, etc.

Electronic system for the elimination of illegitimate officials

Original post here

The United States is offering a $50 million reward for the capture of Venezuela's illegitimate president...

What's the problem with the US? It's that it's increasingly becoming a "banana republic," meaning everything is so well-oiled and organized that people are starting to relax, lose their composure, and think that "since our courts and rewards work, it must work everywhere else." But that's absolutely not true.

How do you imagine someone "getting the president out of the country"? A man with a personal printing press (he can print as much money as he wants), a private army, and no security problems?

Even if there are people willing to kill Maduro, not just oust him (which is much simpler and more realistic), where is the guarantee that the US won't screw them over? Bribes exist in the US too – where is the guarantee that a US government official won't leak the killer's details? There are no guarantees. The US is a people country. People don't like to pay. If given the opportunity, they'll start looking for ways (legal and otherwise) to avoid paying what they promised, as is usually the case.

Therefore, such a $50 million reward is nothing more than a joke. It will never be implemented.

The same goes for an international court – what's the point if the country's president can freely evade it (like Moscow's Putin) and can't bring any claims against the entire country or punish it in any way.

A single public figure is a weak link susceptible to strong influence, often corrupted—this is the root cause of most of the problems in modern society. A computer system controlled by a huge number of anonymous (protected) individuals lacks such weaknesses. You can't bribe such a system, and you can't influence it even with a huge amount of money. Examples like Bitcoin and torrents show that by transferring such a system to a decentralized blockchain, it can be made extremely resistant to destruction.

A large bounty hunter reward is much more effective than an "international manhunt," which is not so difficult to escape.

It's high time to create a decentralized blockchain service where defrauded people anywhere in the world could chip in cryptocurrency to shut down a local illegitimate scam. So that the entire planet would be racing to find him (making it impossible for him to pay off or escape). So that his family members would be taken hostage and exchanged for him (as the intelligence agencies themselves do).

When the system described in the article is launched, there will be mass assassination attempts on illegitimate governors, various riff-raff (like the Muscovite-appointed leader of the DPR), illegitimate court officials, and so on. People agree to murder even for a few million, and for tens or hundreds of millions, they will tear any single person to pieces, and no security will save them.

 

This will happen en masse if there's a rock-solid guarantee of payment (and not just "Trump's promises" — maybe I'll pay, maybe I'll scam). When the target (the illegitimate official) can't "bribe" anyone to cover their own ass.

The cryptocurrency that will kill all existing money

original post was here

INTRODUCTION

This article describes the algorithm of a new type of cryptocurrency. Not another copy of Bitcoin (a variant of the level "buy from me - I figured out how to rip off others"), but a product from the series "Fully functional cryptocurrency version 2.0".

A blockchain product that has been maximally refined and optimized for the realities of the global economy, which will give unprecedented opportunities to everyone who uses it (and naturally also to those who are the first to launch it). This cryptocurrency will eventually (with the right approach) destroy all existing paper money on the planet.

The new cryptocurrency will enable countries with the strongest and most open economies (primarily Western countries) to exert greater influence on countries with weaker economies (pulling them closer to themselves). Weaken the ratings of governments of weak countries, strengthen their positions in these territories.

Idea for New York

In New York and other similar cities in the USA (where there are dense buildings, little greenery. The houses are usually tall (5 floors and above), you need to do the following:

Try to place small pots of flowers near the windows of the second, third, and fourth floors so that an ordinary passerby can enjoy their view. Those residents of houses who equip their windows in this way should have their housing and communal services fees reduced (as if a payment from the city fund goes for improving the appearance of the city).

If there are two tall buildings close to each other, and their windows face each other, then do exactly the same, but up to higher floors (up to the 20th, 30th). So that the view from the window pleases.

The only downside may be a slight reduction in the amount of light coming through the window. But this is not a strong minus. You should try to place flowers as close to the walls as possible and make the pots narrow but long. Then they reduce the flow of light less.

International electronic system for purchasing high-quality services.

It is not difficult to check the quality of a product. To do this, you just need to submit it for examination. For each product there are certain minimum characteristics that it must meet. If it does not meet them, it is subject to return to the seller, and in this case, certain sanctions are applied to the seller.

But in the service sector, everything is much more complicated. You cannot so easily "submit a service for examination" because a service is not a physical, easily transportable object. Also, services are more difficult to standardize than simple goods.

For weaking dictators - you need increase separatism.

Original post was here

The US has a strong advantage in the political architecture when all states are equal and already have very strong local authorities. That is, the US already has a fairly serious defense against state separatism.

But Russia does not have this. This weak spot needs to be hit as hard as possible (because they will not be able to counter you).

We need to move to a system where:

a) the president must be from each state in turn (and not from one Muscovy every 4 years). That is, all 50 states present their candidates. Those who have already been president - wait their turn until 49 presidents from all the other states have passed. The president must be born and live more than 75% of his life in the state in order to be elected to the post of president.

b) the resolution of interstate disputes (interregional for the Russian Federation) is determined not by the "supreme Moscow-Putin court", but by a jury trial, in which the jurors are the chief judges from each region. Previously, such courts would have been very expensive, but today everything can be easily organized via video link. In theory, they do not even need to all be present at the court at the same time; it can be thought out so that they watch the video recording of the hearings and then make their decision in an electronic system.

This will weaken the dictator kings - the regions (in the same RFia), relying on such a system, will demand their rights.

The same jury trial (from judges of all regions) considers cases of governors, mayors (and not the lousy Moscow king "removing someone from office with his decrees").

How to hold a referendum without asking permission from officials. How to make millions selling referendums.

(original post was here )

Introduction.

You can earn a large sum of money selling your product or service only if you are a significant monopolist (i.e. you have no competitors in this market). Before the 20th century, when science and technology were still relatively underdeveloped, people usually became monopolist simply by physically eliminating all competitors (by prohibiting them from selling the same goods and services with the help of "licenses", etc.). As society developed, it became more and more difficult to prohibit others from selling exactly the same goods, due to the increasingly active resistance of competitors, the emergence of various ways to bypass such blockages.

In the 20th century, thanks to the significant development of science and technology, it became possible to produce increasingly technologically complex goods and services. The first to invent a new, more complex product automatically became a monopolist in this market for a certain time and received good superprofits. This became the new main way to earn big money. At the same time, there were still many restrictions: the market was usually limited to one country, and other countries could easily block the possibility of selling your product even if there was high demand for it and there were no competitive offers. Examples of this: communist countries that blocked all Western goods. Today's import duties on imported goods, which some countries introduce, make the product much less competitive.

In the 21st century, the main criteria for a good income for a supplier of goods/services are:

a) high-tech goods/services (this automatically cuts off the maximum number of possible competitors).

b) no ban on access to local markets

The right family crossover.

The right family crossover.

In the middle of the video he says “I need a new car to carry two children, so that it’s inexpensive and hassle-free.”

The optimal configuration would be a 7-8 seat minivan (plenty of space, comfortable interior, convenient sliding doors, easy entry, often folding rear seats into a half-bed). But outwardly he looks “not beautiful” for young people (give them sportiness, massiveness, brutality).

A messenger that sends small messages without the Internet.

at 25 minutes about turning off the Internet during rallies. We need to find options on how to protect ourselves from this. So that people stay connected even when those in power cut off communications to the public.

The video is called "What's Happening #124 | Noize MC and Little Big on the blacklist, Fedotov in the army, protest in Uzbekistan"

How citizens can verify all votes in elections (protection against cheating)

(Original post was here )

Somewhere in 2011, after Alexey Navalny began posting interesting information on the Internet about corruption and election fraud in Russia, I became interested in this topic and began to think about how to improve the electoral system. Make it as honest and transparent as possible, with guaranteed protection against fraud and fraud.

In this article I will share with you a simple option. It is based on a common public database of votes (but without disclosing people’s personal data), which will allow anyone to easily check the accounting of their vote and the votes of relatives, neighbors, and acquaintances.

Competitive parliament vs Monopolistic (for Switzerland )

Example:

The company has 100 people. Of these, 90 do not smoke. And ten smoke. If you make up a parliament from them, what will happen? It turns out that the “non-smoking” party has 90 seats and the “smoking” party has 10 seats. According to the already outdated rules of American democracy, the majority must decide, and it turns out that the party of non-smokers will always vote with its majority so that no one ever smokes in the company. This gives birth to a monopolist. And the minority will be forced to obey them 100% of the time - this will be an infringement of their rights to choose. This happens all the time in modern society - the majority infringes on the rights of minorities.

The following scheme is more fair: every hour ten (for example) people in a company for one hour establish the law that applies to everyone in the company. And then it turns out that smoking in a group will not be allowed 9 hours a day, but 10 smokers will manage one hour a day and they will allow smoking at that hour. This will be fair and just. Smoking is bad, but it is also partly a personal choice. This is just a prime example. The lives of such minorities in society are dark. And the modern parliament (the old American system) does not provide guaranteed tools to somehow defend one’s rights. If the majority is a monopolist, it will always completely strangle the minority. Moreover, even entire regions in the country are strangled by the majority of other regions (they alone cannot oppose anything). Does one region have oil, but not others? That's it, the law is for the majority to take away your oil - you don't have it anymore. Does anyone have anything else? Here's the law for taking this away. In general, it is a wrong, unfair system.

Why some states in USA so poor?

 The richest countries in the world (in terms of GDP per capita), benchmark democracies such as the United States, and European Union countries urgently need to switch to a unicameral parliament. Why? Because it will significantly strengthen the United States and Europe due to the following two factors.

The separation of non-deputies (congressmen) and senators is not correct, it greatly weakens the United States and Europe.

A filthy Chinese-basement translation of the menu in a Google account. Crooked, filthy translation of Google letters.

 If you go into the Google account settings, then instead of the usual clear and convenient short menus and slider switches, the user is bombarded with a Chinese basement verbal mess in the form of “improving the conditions for interaction of the product with advertising integrations of third parties and companies of the second economic zone of the fourth countries,” etc. P. Those. It’s as if the shameful Chinese, in order to fool the client, somehow made a botched translation through an online translator. Absolutely illiterate clumsy texts. What’s in the Google account menu, what’s in the emails that Google sends.

another ideas here

Idea for usa

 The toilet must be specifically designed for use in a public restroom.

The toilet in a public toilet is used in the following way: a special paper liner is placed inside the toilet (it protects the toilet from contamination by discharged matter), this paper liner is washed off along with the fecal matter during flushing.

A small seat is placed on top of the toilet, on which a person must put a special, clean plastic cover. After the “deeds are done,” the cover is removed and thrown away.

Peeing while standing is prohibited (no urinals), only while sitting - it’s much more hygienic (you won’t miss, splashes won’t fly, you won’t get yourself dirty)

You can also be required to wear shoe covers in the toilet (if, for example, it is an outdoor public toilet, and the street is dirty and wet.

This will make using a public toilet much more comfortable.

Decentralized electronic blockchain voting service

 Clear, honest display of voting results in the form of blocks with votes.

The program must allow the user to verify that the voting is truly fair. That not a single voice is faked or distorted. But at the same time without disclosing the personal data of the country’s citizens. To do this you need to use the following method.

The final voting results should be tallied and displayed in blocks. The topmost level (block) is the entire country. This block is divided into smaller blocks: "regions". Next, each block-region is divided into smaller ones - “region” blocks. Next are the “city” blocks. Next are the “districts” blocks. Then comes the next block - “streets”. Then comes the most important block - "apartment building". Next, the block is a “separate apartment” (a separate private house is equated to the same block if it does not contain separate apartments within itself).

Many ideas to improve the lives of the American people

Many ideas to improve the lives of the American people you can find here.

Ideas for transport here

ideas for living here

ideas for technology here

Ideas for usa democracy here.

Ideas for european democracy here.

The toilet must be specifically designed for use in a public restroom.

 The toilet must be specifically designed for use in a public restroom.

The toilet in a public toilet is used in the following way: a special paper liner is placed inside the toilet (it protects the toilet from contamination by discharged matter), this paper liner is washed off along with the fecal matter during flushing.

A small seat is placed on top of the toilet, on which a person must put a special, clean plastic cover. After the “deeds are done,” the cover is removed and thrown away.

Peeing while standing is prohibited (no urinals), only while sitting - it’s much more hygienic (you won’t miss, splashes won’t fly, you won’t get yourself dirty)

You can also be required to wear shoe covers in the toilet (if, for example, it is an outdoor public toilet, and the street is dirty and wet.

This will make using a public toilet much more comfortable.

Idea on how to check links in video descriptions on YouTube

YouTube has banned links in comments and descriptions for Shorts due to a wave of spam

You need to introduce the following system:

Anyone who wants to add their own link to the description of their video must first check 2 other people’s links for possible fraudulent content. Moreover, one or even two of these checked links must be specially generated by Google’s neural network (fraudulent content must be embedded in them). If a person tries to evade a thorough check of links, then the ability to add links to the description of videos is blocked on his channel for 1-2 years.

Many ideas for the United States in the fight against anti-democratic countries.

There are many useful ideas for the United States in the fight against authoritarian regimes in the draft (non-public) publications of this blog.

Also many interesting ideas i find read this blog and Here